Directory profiles · Battery Business Directory
Organizations mentioned or cited on this 2021 report page. A historical mention does not establish current products, availability or endorsement.
Sources and links on page 12 (3)
Links embedded in the original report PDF, including citations and other references. These destinations have not been independently reviewed. Links open in a new tab.
- https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiI-t6y0qv1AhXUJjQIHV9oBMIQFnoECAUQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bloombergquint.com%2Fbusiness%2Felon-musk-s-battery-day-could-reveal-very-cheap-batteries&usg=AOvVaw1xs-t28QcMl8-I-r9Fl1LR
- https://news.ihsmarkit.com/prviewer/release_only/slug/2020-09-23-milestone-average-cost-of-lithium-ion-battery-cell-to-fall-below-100-per-kilowatt-hour-in-2023
- https://www.energymonitor.ai/tech/energy-storage/reducing-battery-cost-is-essential-for-a-clean-energy-future
Text on page 12
Cell Cost Developments for Passengers Cars until 2030 [1]
IHS Markit: 73
BNEF: 61
Solid-state technology. Materials are costly and use less established processing methods. Manufacturing costs are strongly dependent on the production of solid electrolyte. Any cost advantages arise from omission of production steps (e.g., formation/aging). Sodium-ion technology. Significant materials cost reduction identified for Na-ion technology. Lower energy density, however, may limit the overall cost reduction to only 10-30% per kWh.
1. High-volume production of >8 GWh/a with dedicated facility Note: Cost values tabulated by P3 Consulting, unless otherwise specified.
Industry Source:
cost assessment & benchmark data, Bloomberg, IHS Markit, Energy Monitor
Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.
Page 12 · 3/8