Directory profiles · Battery Business Directory
Organizations mentioned or cited on this 2023 report page. A historical mention does not establish current products, availability or endorsement.
Sources and links on page 39 (2)
Links embedded in the original report PDF, including citations and other references. These destinations have not been independently reviewed. Links open in a new tab.
- https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeremy-lowen-05248b177_sustainability-batteries-ev-activity-7142793212045250560-wuuq?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
- https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aaron--wade_sustainability-batteries-costs-activity-7141041691423158272-LFmr?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Text on page 39
Cell Costs
LMFP & Na-Ion
LMFP & Na-Ion
LMFP cost advantage increases with lithium price. Na-ion cost structure is anode-heavy.
The LMFP-LFP cost difference is more profound in a high lithium price scenario It is also more cost effective to use solid-phase rather than a liquid-phase production route
Na-ion is not yet cost-competitive with Li-ion due to the immature supply chain for hard carbon. This drives up cost of the anode
Short term = 2023 - 2024 | Medium term = 2025 - 2028 | Long term = 2029+
Source: CRU Group [1], [2]
Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.
Page 39 · 6/6