VFBATTERY REPORT
Industry

Cell Design and Materials: Li-Ion

Page 326 of 768
Battery Report 2025, page 326: Cell Design and Materials: Li-Ion
Sources and links on page 326 (2)

Links embedded in the original report PDF, including citations and other references. These destinations have not been independently reviewed. Links open in a new tab.

  1. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jkbxApg-jKzAdB3QDlXRnTef3Iuq96ArM_tOErHlF_Q/edit?slide=id.p173#slide=id.p173
  2. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/ra/c3ra40878g
Text on page 326

LMNO vs. LMO In LMNO compared to LMO, Mn is partially replaced by Ni and incorporating Ni into the system raises the redox voltage, resulting in increased overall energy density

LMNO offers a higher energy density, typically around 180-200 Wh/kg, whereas LMO possess a moderate energy density 140-160 Wh/kg

LMNO has a higher cutoff voltage of 4.7 V, whereas LMO has a cutoff voltage of 4.2 V

LMNO has improved low-temperature performance compared to LMO Challenges LMO:

Lower energy density → less range for EVs

Capacity fade due to Mn dissolution at high temperatures LMNO:

Higher cost due to Ni

Slightly reduced thermal stability compared to pure LMO

More sensitive to electrolyte decomposition at high voltage

LMO

LMNO

LMO (0% Ni) 4.0 V

30% Ni 4.3V

50% Ni 4.7V

70% Ni 4.8V

80% Ni 4.9V

LNO (100% Ni) 4.4V

120.0 mAh/g 180.0 Wh/kg

170.0 mAh/g 230.0 Wh/kg

200.0 mAh/g 300.0 Wh/kg

220.0 mAh/g 330.0 Wh/kg

230.0 mAh/g 360.0 Wh/kg

250.0 mAh/g 380.0 Wh/kg

Source: Volta Battery Report 2024 (Slide 230), K. Mukai et al. RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 11634-11639

Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.

More in Industry (22)
Authors for Cell Design & Materials (4)

Page 326 · 30/63